Posts by date: November 2008

Twilight

Posted by S. Parise on Nov 25, 2008 with 6 Comments
in Aesthetics, Cinema

What do you make of Twilight hoopla?

Here is a good review of the move via John Nolte.

Here are some thoughts about the attraction of vampires:

The vampire myth is all wonky today because at root vampires are anti-Christians and without a fundamental cultural understanding and appreciation for the goods of Christianity, there’s no real understanding of what vampires really are.

Here are some thoughts about the attraction of Twilight’s vampires:

Bella = every teenage girl who is told by EVERYONE that sex/sin is the way to personal flourishing — including her mother, her father, her brothers, and her best friends. She is no where safe from pressure to have sex. Enter Edward.  . . .teenage girls today are desperate for protection from the sexual predators and enablers of sexual predators that surround them. They all want an Edward.

D. Z. Phillips & What It Means To Believe in God

Posted by S. Parise on Nov 19, 2008 with 3 Comments
in D. Z. Phillips, Philosophy, Religion

For many years, up ’til his death a few years ago, I studied under D. Z. Phillips.  I am not alone in thinking Phillips, along with Alvin Plantinga, the greatest philosopher of religion of the twentieth century.

But he was more than a philosopher of religion.  I cannot think of an area of philosophy about which he did not have something profound to say.  He possessed a towering and intimidating intellect.  I’ve been witness to many of the most notable philosophers of our time reduced to silence with a simple question or two.

So, I was delighted to come across a small lecture he gave many years ago.  You may listen or read it, or read and listen to it – that would be my suggestion.  I shall resume my own transcribing of Phillips’ lectures and debates shortly.   Enjoy:

“Do you believe in God?

If you say you do, you’ll be asked why you believe in God.  Probably you won’t object to that question.

After all, if you say you believe something, you think it reasonable that you should be asked for your reasons for believing it. The reasonableness of giving reasons for your beliefs is something you take for granted.  A reasonable request isnt it?

But now, listen to this:

Whither shall I go from thy spirit?  Or whither shall I flee from thy presence?

If I ascend up into heaven, thou are there: If I make my bed in hell, behold, thou art there.

If I take the wings of the morning, and dwell in the uttermost parts of the sea; Even there shall thy hand lead me, and thy right hand shall hold me.

If I say, suely the darkness shall cover me; even the night shall be light about me.  Yea, the darkness hideth not from thee; but the night shineth as the day:  the darkness and the light are both alike to thee.

For thou hast possessed my reins; thous hast covered me in my mother’s womb.

I will praise thee; for I am fearfully and wonderfully made: marvelous are thy works; and that my soul knoweth right well.   -Psalm 139: 7-14

Here it is clear the psalmist testifies to the inescapable reality of God.  Inescapable?

But what about the evidence?  What about the reasons?

Well, it has to be admitted that it never ocurred to any prophet or writer in the Old Testament to seek evidence for this existence of God, let alone to prove it.  For them this would be quite pointless, even senseless.

The movement of thought in the Old Testament is not from the world to God, but from God to the world.  The whole world declared God’s presence.  Not because it gave excellent evidence for God’s existence.  But because the world was seen, from the start, as God’s world.

The hills are girded with joy, the pastures are clothed with flocks.

The valley’s also are covered with grain.  They shout for joy.  They also sing.

Let the floods clap their hands.  Let the hills sing for joy together.

Oh Jehovah, how manifold are thy works.  In wisdom hast thous made them all.  The earth is full of thy riches. – Psalm 65

How far away that seems.  That world is not our world.  It hasn’t been our world for quite some time.  Ever since the Rennaisance and through the Enlightenment, the view of the world as God’s world has been under attack.

As a result it’s become natural for us to look on religious belief as a conjecture, a hypothesis.  And we look for evidence to justify it.  Philosophers who write on such matters are busy weighing the probabilities.

Some say the probablitiy is that there is a God.  Others say that the probability is that there is no God.  And despite allegedly weighing the same probabilites, they never agree.  How very odd.  In this scientific age one would at least expect people to be able to calculate.

Did the Psalmist miscalculate?  But really is that our problem?  A difficulty in weighing probabilities?  Surely not.

Our difficulty is that the majority of us no longer naturally see the world as God’s world.  It’s all too easy to escape from God’s presence.  If we ascend into the heavens, well even Bishops tell us He’s not there.  If we descend into the depths, again psychoanalysts tell us He’s not there either.

Our problem, it seems, is not how to escape from God, but how to find him.  We all too easily rise in the morning and lie down in darkness without Him.  The heavens no longer declare his glory for us, and the hills no longer sing for joy.”

KBJ on Same-Sex Marriage

Posted by S. Parise on Nov 10, 2008 with 2 Comments
in Uncategorized

Much confusion about same-sex marriage abounds.  For example, though I believe most religious people oppose the legalization of same-sex marriage, the basis for keeping lawful marriage between one man and one woman isn’t rooted in religious belief necessarily.

If you’re interested in understanding such a thing, then you can do no better than Keith Burgess-Jackson.  Professor Burgess-Jackson specializes in clarity (that’s what philosophers do), and he’s an atheist.  This last point is irrelevant logically.  But it does matter emotionally.  No one can accuse professor Burgess-Jackson of trying to impose his religious beliefs on others.

I give you KBJ on “homosexual” marriage.